I’ve blogged about Natalie Portman before, and when I did, I confessed to the world my lack of like for the mediocre actress (please, spare me your criticisms).
Well, it appears as though Ms. Portman does nothing but magazine spreads these days (actually, I don’t know WHAT she’s been up to lately, but I’m seeing an awful lot of her face on glossy finish paper).

This cover is kind of wowza. I mean, for a generally unattractive person, Natalie sure pulled out all the stops here. Her article’s subtitle seems to sum it up quite well. “The Sexy Funny Side of a Hollywood Enigma” I mean, I think we can all guess what the sexy side is. Hello, open-mouth stare. As for the funny side, well, I guess we need to turn a few pages to discover that.

Not funny, but quite stunning. There’s something I’m loving about this high fashion version of Natalie. The styling team did a superb job (way to go, Olivia!). Things are looking great, and then all of a sudden BAM, Man Face appears.

*shiver*
Not only is she sporting Man Face, but that potato sack of a dress isn’t doing a THING for her. The photo is a tragedy any way you look at it. Where’s wardrobe? Where is hair and makeup? Where are her FEET?
Then Natalie seems to be saying something to the readers of ELLE.

“I was cold on the cover, but damn, it got hot in here! Wanna see my underwears?”
No, Natalie, we don’t. And may I be frank? If you’re going to be photographed in next to nothing, why not ACTUALLY make it next to nothing?! This is the lamest sexy photo shoot I’ve ever seen. I applaud your effort to be sexy-modest, but any effort at something like THAT seems futile. Give the people what they want, or give them nothing at all. I’m still waiting for that moment when you steal my heart because you seem to have grabbed the attention of every other man in America. Until then, I’m content with viewing you in random states of dressed up undress in magazines all across the country.











